ROSH CHODESH: VIEWING THE NEW-MOON APART FROM CLOUDS OF CONFUSION

This is a more important topic than many realize. Many, including some of my friends, are going to HATE what I write here; REGARDLESS: It is fact! Depending on how much one is committed to the traditions of man that are contrary to Scripture, or not - they'll either reject or receive this. 

As we move more into these End-Times: Over the last few years there are now countless teachings, on pretty much every subject, that are full of errors, half-truths, or even complete lies. Sometimes these things come about from sincere people simply repeating incorrect things that they've heard as though they were facts; others times the motives are more sinister and agenda based. - One of these important matters that needs to be addressed is concerning the various conflicting teachings on "Rosh Chodesh / The New-Moon". Rosh Chodesh is more important than you may at first think. I believe that part of the reason for the confusion that has sprung up over the last few years concerning it, is from the enemies' attempt to cloud the set & established Moadim/(The Appointed Times) of YHVH, and to veil the wonders in the heavens that are associated with them...which are to be witnessing signs to a dying world. Another reason for all of the sharp division on this subject that’s been increasing, is the enemy trying to sow discord in the camp – just like with all the arguments on the “Rapture”; One-House/Two-House/Duplex; & etc. (fill in the blank); and on and on it goes ! Now some people’s answer to this division, is to simply ignore the issues, and instead endorse the idea of everyone doing their own thing. – While this is fine in disputable dogmatic matters (Romans 14); it becomes more of a serious issue when these contentions involve the Moadim/(Appointed times) & Observances given in YHVH’s Word. – And while someone holding a minority view in these matters (even when incorrect) is their problem/business -(since we still, for the time being anyway, have the right to be wrong in this country – Oy!), yet it suddenly becomes everyone’s problem when these minority factions insist that they alone are right, and then attempt to impose their traditions and commentaries on the Body of Messiah as a whole – and then that wrong attitude is further compounded when those stances they’re trying to impose are obviously and demonstrably shown by fact as being in error, whether they are willing to admit it or not...as now their contentions have crossed over into seeking to cause division and introduce error into the Body of Messiah. – Simply allowing this to fester without addressing it, is not the answer – ignoring a problem is most often not the correct way of dealing with it. (And two of the very worst offender groups are those who militantly insist the calendar of the Bible is an Enochian/solar one; and those who insist that Shabbat is re-set with each new moon...those that falsely say the Shabbat is not every 7th day from Friday sundown through Saturday sundown! - Those two views are so obviously false and divisive, that I won't even take the time to address them here - and will focus instead on the Biblical lunar calendar.).

The very FIRST thing that we as Believers MUST do is to place what Scripture says (Tanakh & Brit HaChadashah / O.T. & N.T.) as our first and foremost Authority over our walk and life, and That far above ALL commentaries of man. - The surviving writings & views of the Sadduceean & their splinter groups (including Essenes/Qumran, and the quite a bit later Karaites), and the writings & views of the Pharisees (which also had factions within it, mainly such as the Houses both of Hillel & Shammai), are just that, ‘commentary’. - And the more you look into it, the more you’ll note that pretty much none of these groups agree with each other on all kinds of issues, and are often not even agreeing among themselves in their own group (such as the minority and majority opinions in Talmud, the sharp disagreements between the Houses of Hillel and Shammai; and the disputes between the various Sadduceean/priestly-based groups; and etc..) Now some tend to think of the Talmud as a final authority on Biblical Judaism, when in reality it is the writings of a quite small in numbers group that survived the 1st century A.D. destruction of Jerusalem. Even though they did play an important role during LATE Biblical times, they were by no means the only authority at that time. Now, if you go by their own historical writings (Agada) you’d think they go back to the time of Elijah, or even earlier; but in reality both they (as the Parush party), and all the other Judaic factions, started to form as distinct groups beginning from the time under the Hasmonean dynasty (140–37 B.C.) in the wake of the Maccabean Revolt – so all these factions being late comers in the History of Biblical Israel from Moses on. Before this time, the halacha/rites of the Temple were only under the administration of the Cohanim/(Priests), as the Sanhedrin back then was not so much of a political body as it later became, but was more just a judicial body, as it was first set up by Moses to be. – Now part of the problem today is, when you read each of these factions writings, you’re tempted to think: ‘I’ve finally found the truth! These were the enlightened ones!’...but that’s just what each group is trying to portray themselves as; but the reality is different. For example the Talmud comes across as the House of Hillel being like 99% correct on everything; but part of the reason for this is that after the time of the Resurrection of Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus), the House of Hillel had a heated argument one day with the House of Shammai in the Sanhedrin, and during the fight that broke out, the House of Hillel killed off all of the House of Shammai ! Needless to say then, the later Talmudic commentary is most favorable to Hillel ! So then the surviving Pharisees of the House of Hillel went on to be the start of what became modern Rabbinic Judaism; and so here we are today. Now, there ARE some important things that are preserved for us from the early Rabbinic writings-(and the earlier the better, as there are some things written by the early ‘sages’ during the Biblical era that are quite valuable; whereas some of the other factions commentaries/writings, such as from the more later occurring Karaite movement, have less worth in that context.), important things in regards to some of both Halacha-(interpretive law), and Agada-(legends/history), including customs and history that are in accord with Written Scripture. However: There are also many things that are invalid, inaccurate, including some things that are in complete discord with Torah/Tanakh and are very bad and will send you down a wrong road quick! So the bottom line is: While there is a portion of value in what all of these factions have preserved for us in their writings, yet they ALL must be treated ONLY as commentary, and as a DISTANT secondary to YHVH’s Written Word. –(I've given this brief overview as it will figure in later on in this article). So it’s a very important thing to note that during the 1st Century A.D. Judaism in Israel was just as fractured with all those various groups, even as ‘Messianic/Hebraic-roots’-Judaism has become today over the last few years. But their sharp divisions started about a century and a half before Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) birth; while our increasingly woeful divisions have only been going on for the last few years…let’s pray that this ceases before Messiah comes back !

--> [PLEASE NOTE: One of the premises given and outlined in this article is that the Hebrew calendar that's used by Israel today, which was from calculations done by Hillel II, is far closer to the Biblical (& creation lunar conjunction New-Moon based) calendar used in Biblical era Israel, than is the Karaite-(or even any other early minority calendar method). The current Hebrew calendar, (excepting for their occasional 'postponement rule'), uses a very accurate Mean Conjunction calculation, (verses an Astronomical Conjunction), and then it sets Rosh Chodesh (Day 1) at the earliest possible time that the moon could be seen from Jerusalem Israel following that conjunction...and in so doing it has placed the 1st of the months pretty much inside of a 24 hour window of the actual creation lunar conjunctions. - Whereas the Karaite calendar varies at least 1 day, and often even more days, beyond this...and so it can be quite far removed from the actual Rosh Chodesh, New/Conjunction Moon, that YHVH made in creation. - Is the current Hebrew calendar perfect? No: But while there were various calendars available that smaller groups were using in the 1st Century A.D.; yet: Yeshua and the Disciples went instead by the main calendar system that was being used by the Nation of Israel at that time, and so should we go by the main system used today...And especially so in this case since, (short of everyone agreeing to use an Astronomical Conjunction calendar), the modern Hebrew/Israeli calendar is closer to the literal Peshat understanding of the verses concerning Rosh Chodesh in Tanakh, than is the Karaite, or any other minority system, that these smaller groups would try and insist we must use.]

We've already discussed several aspects of this in some depth in prior notes/studies-(see links below); but let's first examine this in an overview from a literal and plain reading of Scripture, as well as circumspectly looking at it based on observable FACTS, and in a historical context...

Paul speaks in Colossians 2:16 of the New-Moon/(Rosh Chodesh), along with the Biblical Holy Day Festivals of YHVH (re: The Fall Feasts), as being: (Prophetic)-"shadows of things TO COME". While Rosh Chodesh is not one of the main Festivals of YHVH given in Torah; yet He accords it much importance in Scripture...So much so that it is a given requirement for all people (including the goyim/gentiles) during the 1000 year Reign of Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) upon the earth...

"And it shall come to pass, that from one New Moon to another, and from one Shabbat/(Sabbath) to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith YHVH/(the LORD)." - Isa.66:23.

It is a delight and liberty to observe and partake in the Moadim and Observances of YHVH that He's given us in Scripture. - But this takes a sharp digression into the profane when any human or small group, emboldens themselves to think that they alone have been given the (self)-appointed task of moving the literal set times of the Moadim that have already been built and established into the very fabric of creation by YHVH, by using their man-made traditions that even contradict Scripture ! Appearing as though YHVH should have to wait on them, and expecting that the whole world should be held in suspense until they speak !

The “Appointed Time” first of all speaks of the ACTUAL physical creation event that IS ALREADY a reality; but then one looking for these “Appointed Times” to a degree involves man’s calculations of when those events are. – And that is where the error begins: When some give their own notions contrary to Scripture concerning the ‘Appointed Times’, and on how they say these things should be determined.

Since ancient Biblical times Rosh-Chodesh has always been understood by the Jewish people to mean both ‘the New-Moon’ and ‘the (fixed) 1st day of each month’; yet today you’ll hear various notions from groups trying to tell you what they say “Rosh Chodesh” should mean. Some of the teachings they give are very lengthy and verbose, even seemingly valid as they quote (supposedly) scholarly-sounding texts and from ancient writings. And there are various ancient quotations on CONFLICTING lunar and solar calendar systems that different groups have used in the past. - But does YHVH Himself define for us in Scripture very exactly and precisely just what is Rosh Chodesh (the New Moon), which is the FIXED & ESTABLISHED 1st day of His Biblical lunar creation calendar months? – YES! - And He does so in a way which can’t be mistaken, and He even relates it for us to the Holy Day of Yom HaTeruah-(the Biblical Festival of YHVH of Trumpets / Rosh-HaShannah), so we won’t miss its significance/application!...

Blow the ram’s horn at the new moon, at the covered in darkness (hidden) moon, on our feast day.” – Psalms 81:3 (NOTE: This is a literal Hebrew reading. – There’s a more detailed study on this found in the links at the end of this article).

But some will still say: Even if this is a definition of what the New-Moon actually is, don’t we still have to wait until we see a sliver-crescent before we can declare and know what the first day of the next month actually is? – NO ! Scripture again plainly states in the Peshat otherwise, when It shows what day will be Rosh Chodesh (The New Moon, the 1st day of the Biblical month) BEFORE it actually arrives!...

And David said unto Jonathan, Behold, TO MORROW is the New Moon, and I should not fail to sit with the king at meat: but let me go, that I may hide myself in the field unto the third day at even.” – 1Samuel 20:5.

Then Jonathan said to David, TO MORROW is the New Moon: and thou shalt be missed, because thy seat will be empty.” – 1Samuel 20:18.

The 1st day of the Biblical months are already ESTABLISHED, they already exist! Any confirmation of the appointed times does NOT move the appointed times themselves, and so they are only a backwards-confirmation, and should NEVER be a forward marker for moving the 1st day of the months! - How is yet another way we can know this? – YHVH Himself built into the creation two witnesses (that are also noted as wonders in Scripture) that are self-correcting indicators that show if your ‘traditional’ calendars are correct or not: A Solar Eclipse can ONLY happen on a New-Moon (conjunction moon, Rosh-Chodesh) – PERIOD! If your calendar is a day off from this event being noted on the 1st of the month –then it is in error– PERIOD! For if you’ve seen a full Solar Eclipse you actually HAVE JUST WITNESSED a New-Moon! The second witness is: A ‘Blood Red Moon’ (full lunar eclipse) which can ONLY happen on the exact center (15th) of a lunar month. When YHVH says to observe a Festival on the 15th of a month He means the exact center of a lunar month, not X number of days(s) later. If your calendars note a Blood-Red full lunar eclipse happening on a different date...then they are to one degree or another in error- PERIOD!

(NOTE: There are other observable clear indications of the New-Moon too: A New-Moon can be seen, as documented in modern times, as early as 14.75+ hours from its being 100% “New”, and so before a next 24 hour day ‘sliver’. – ALSO: A final waning ‘sliver/crescent’ occurs on the day BEFORE a New-Moon, and can show, if in accord with the calculations, that the next night is to be Rosh-Chodesh).

And so why then is this VERY important to understand?...Not only because it says in Scripture for example: “He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down.” – Ps.104:19; but also because Eclipses (solar, blood-red/lunar) are spoken of in Scripture prophetically as being End-Time wonders and warnings signs to a dying world of coming Judgment: (Isaiah 13:10; Joel 2:31; Luke 21:25; Acts 2:20; & etc..). – The EXTREME problem arises then if one incorrectly follows a sighted-crescent/sliver moon to set a random 1st day of the month, so that the ‘wonders’ established during the creation in the heavens that fall on FIXED Biblical Holy Days, will NEVER happen on them, as your calendar falsely moves YHVH’s Holy Days from the Rosh Chodesh (1st day of the month) of the actual creation lunar calendar, to a different day each month, and in so doing ignores the commands of when to do the 15th day Moadim, since you having moved the days of the actual creation lunar month (always by at least a day or often even more!) - so that any sign from YHVH will have been made of no effect since their not being noted by you on those days, due to your following traditions that contradiction the plain meaning of Scripture! Eclipses have been noted by ancient historians as having happened on significant events with prophetic implications in the past. - Now much of the world in general knows something about the current Hebrew/Israeli calendar-(more on this a little later); and so if a ‘wonder’ as mentioned in Scripture happens on a Biblical Holy Day (as they have in the past and are coming up in the future); then people can take note and reflect, and perhaps see what’s been happening that’s related to prophecy, and see what appears to be coming up, and so perhaps they may repent. – But if they’re waiting on the confirmation of some obscure group to tell them (INCORRECTLY) when the Holy Days will be, then the sign is veiled, as the actual Holy Days have been clouded by the confusion of your traditions!

Rosh Chodesh speaks of a going forth from darkness unto light, in that when a conjunction/new moon begins on the center of that same day to start leaving being 100% dark, it is now entering into light. Fitting then for the Biblical months (such as Aviv/Nissan the 1st of the Biblical prophetic calendar year; and Yom-HaTeruah/Rosh-HaShannah) to begin with this ACTUAL event of creation. - The length of time from one lunar conjunction (Rosh Chodesh / New Moon) to the next is: 29 days, 12 hours, 44 minutes, 3.33 seconds. This calculation has been known and used since ancient times. The calculations used in the current Israeli/Hebrew calendar for the New-Moon are a Mean Lunation Length, which was also used by Ptolemy and handed down from much earlier, which is still very accurate: ca. 29.530594 days vs. a present value of 29.530589 days. - This difference of only 0.0000005, or five millionths of a day, adds up to about only 4 hours since Babylonian times! This calendar then notes the scientific lunar conjunction time length (hence: fairly closely reflecting the ACTUAL NEW MOON AND BEGINNING OF THE LUNAR MONTHS) for the 1st day of each month, and so it doesn't just add non-existent days to the prior month, nor is it removing actual existing days (one or even more) from the start of every lunar month; but the sighted sliver/crescent Karaite calendar does so, being contrary and in error. (However: The modern Hebrew/Israeli calendar does at times use a postponement rule, which causes a digression of a day from the creation lunar calendar, which myself and others are not pleased with, as then it's also not in accord, for example, with the literal day that Yom Kippur should be on. But it's still closer to the creation lunar calendar than the Karaite is; even though it is using a Mean Conjunction calculation verses an Astronomical Conjunction.)

So if we know the exact time why should one still bother to go out and look for the moon at its appointed time? Various reasons why: What if the calculations were lost during some time period or anther in Biblical times; or what if the copy of the calculations one had might have been copied wrong. And since the observance of Rosh Chodesh involves the moon phase, seeing the moon is a part of that celebration. Yet: Sighting/confirming the New-Moon does NOT change the starting 1st days of the created lunar months! Part of some peoples misunderstanding of this is perhaps based on interjecting too much notion into what the Rabbinic literature says:

"…While the early Mishnah writings talks about 'witnesses', it doesn't specifically 100% say that their account is necessarily ADDING non-existent days to the prior month, nor SUBTRACTING days of YHVH's set lunar creation month -(but that is not so with the later Tal. Tractate commentary however). In the Mishnah (Not counting where it says: "when time was lacking for the ceremony...the following day became the new moon..."); the text does seems to indicate that the literal actual Mean Conjunction date itself is also 'sanctified'; as we read @ Rosh HaShannah 2:7/(Neusner): "...c.) Whether it appears in the expected time or does not appear in the expected time, they sanctify it. d.) R. Eleazar b. R. Sondoq says, "If it did NOT appear in the expected time, they do NOT sanctify it, FOR HEAVEN HAS ALREADY DECLARED IT SANCTIFIED." - Which R.Ele. in saying indicates that yet it IS sanctified if it is "in the expected time"...and so... speaks of a backwards marker of the day of the month, NOT a forward 1st of the month whenever it happens to be sighted - one, two (a week?!) later! - But in looking at this: I don't see anything, from Mishnah (which is a close to Biblical era Rabbinic writing), that says a month will not begin until a human has sighted a sliver - and it seems to even imply that by their witness they testify that a new/dark moon HAD happened. FURTHERMORE: Besides the fact there is NO Sanhedrin operating in this capacity in Israel today; the methods we have recorded for various groups, such as the Sadducees, Qumran, and the neo-Kararites, don't even agree 100% amongst themselves. – But what we DO have is the simple plain clear Peshat Mitzvout of Torah, which are made of no effect if the traditions of man ignore the actual physical New Moons starting the months that YHVH built into creation (and so then also violating the 15th day Moadim which are also built into the very fabric of creation in a set-time, immovable in the lunar calendar months.) In the later post Temple/Biblical-era there are a few comments in the Talmudic Tractate commentary to Mishnah Rosh HaShannah that indicate a next day was used, if it was deemed possible the moon could also have appeared on that day; but even then there's a statement (Speaking of the 29th days of Adar & Elul): "...If, however, the court sanctified the moon at the conclusion of the twenty-ninth day, as we have explained, and the messengers heard the court pronounce it sanctified..." - And being as that lunar months are 29.5 days long, and with them recorded here as having sanctifying the 29th day of a 29 day month, it would seem to again indicate possibly a backwards confirmation - as a full sliver/crescent being seen on the 29th would not seem very likely at all. And even if they are adding in that case, they speak of having a cut-off of the last day a New Moon could possibly be seen (whether its seen or not). But keep in mind that much of the Talmudic Tractate commentary is also speaking on what was done post-Temple and post-Mishnah, and much of it too is commentary about times prior to the Hillel II calendar. And remember that we DO know that in King David's time they DID know BEFOREHAND when Rosh Chodesh was coming and was to be celebrated! - Is the modern Hebrew/Israeli calendar perfect in all regards? No; but it is far closer (even in using a Mean Conjunction calculation +X-hours, verses an Astronomical Conjunction) to reflecting the Biblical lunar creation calendar, than is the Karaite calendar method...which pretty much would never recognize a short 29 day in length lunar month, since they start counting with the sighted crescent (verses the x-hours past a Mean Conjunction calculation of the New-Moon, which the current Hebrew/Israeli calendar uses, and which does recognize fixed 29 & 30 day length months) ..."

Once again: The above Rabbinic commentary is just that – commentary. Some of it is concerning halacha that had developed centuries after the destruction of the Temple, when the Talmud(s) were written down. If, (or even when), they ‘added days’ to the fixed months, after sighting a sliver-crescent moon, in the centuries following 70 A.D. (or even if they did that before before that time); that is not our primary consideration in these matters….For one thing we know for sure is that they ceased doing that after the time of Hillel II with the calendar we still have today. HOWEVER: As we've seen, the Tanakh clearly shows that they DID know exactly when Rosh Chodesh was and when to celebrate it BEFORE it happened! – And Tanakh/(Scripture) alone is our PRIMARY source, standard, and guide in all matters. Now some commentary says that the reason they knew BEFOREHAND during King David’s time, but that then the situation later changed, was due to YHVH changing the planetary alignment later during King Hezekiah’s reign -(when the sundial shadow return backward ten degrees – 2Ki.20:9-11). Now while that is an interesting thought, that is STILL COMMENTARY! We don’t know if that is a factual reason or not, and there’s nothing in Tanakh/(Scripture) to say that was the reason that ‘supposedly’ they now no longer knew the correct time beforehand, nor is there anything that suggests the fixed rotation of the moon around the earth changed when the sundial returned backwards 10 degrees – that’s all speculation, and I might add that suggested reason given in commentaries is merely an excuse; why? – Because one very logical assumption is that the various factions/groups, that had formed from the Maccabean time on, were arguing and posturing in and out of the Sanhedrin to position themselves into a place of authority and self-importance, with each of their groups trying to impose their methods on determining the Modaim, calendar, and observances for the House of Israel! – Much like what we’re seeing today happening from various groups in the Messianic/Hebrew-roots movement! – And actually that premise can be demonstrated when one examines all of the various writings of these early factions/groups, and their disagreements, regarding their individual calendars and methods of determining the Moadim. – And so it appears this is also sadly happening today! 

– NOW: The good news is, that following the destruction of the Temple later on when Hillel II started the calendar that Israel used thereafter and on till today, we now have a method that is being used by MOST Jewish people and Messianic groups, that is actually fairly accurate to the actual Rosh Chodesh literal/conjunction moon. – And as mentioned earlier: While it uses a Mean Conjunction Scientific calculation for determining the 1st of the months (with the exception of when the Postponement rule is used), instead of an Astronomical Conjunction, and even though it then sets the time forward just over 17 hours from that Mean Conjunction for the start of Rosh Chodesh, yet this most often gives us a 1st of the month within about a 24 hour window, give or take, from the actual event. – Far more accurate the the Kararite movement is doing (which can end up quite far removed from the actual Rosh Chodesh); and so I’d note the current Hebrew/Israeli calendar is more in line with the plain Peshat reading of Scripture in these matters, and since it is using a fixed Rosh-Chosesh (verses a floated sighting) it is also more in align with the fact Scripture very clearly says they KNEW BEFOREHAND the day of Rosh Chodesh and when to celebrate it. 

– So again, to conclude and restate this point: Short of getting everyone in the world to agree to some sort of an Astronomical Conjunction calendar: The modern Hebrew/Israeli calendar is the closest we have today to the Biblical lunar calendar YHVH intended. And since that is also the norm and what is in use by most today, that is what we should stick with for our observances, so as to be in a timely accord wherever we may be. – Now if someone wants to also use another method for themselves (even if that minority method is in error), fine – let they do so. – BUT: I’d suggest that they don’t slight and ignore the literal readings of Scripture and the Conjunction moons and those who go by them…which includes those of us who go by the current Hebrew/Israeli calendar, since most of the time that calendar aligns in that way as well. – Don’t cause division with your trying to impose your minority stances on the Body of Messiah in issues of this nature, even if you feel your stances are right (whether you’re right or not)…Perhaps consider your keeping of “both” – your personal tradition, along with celebrating the Moadim with the rest of the Body who’s not following what you’re doing. – REGARDLESS: May this cease to be an issue of spiritual pride and confusion!

[NOTE: While many would like you to believe that the neo-Karaites are “directly” from the original Sopherim &/or the Sadducees; yet the Karaism movement didn’t really begin to solidify until the 4th Century A.D. & later, one of its main premises being an anti-Pharisee party. While some of their writings are interesting in their debates against the Rabbis, some others are obviously wrong in their understanding of Torah. – For example: The debate with the Pharisee/Rabbinic Jews in saying that Torah forbids a fire to burn over into Shabbat (hence their adding to the plain command of Torah to only refrain from “kindling” a fire on Shabbat) so that they (the Karaism) would sit in the dark in their homes and Synagogues on Shabbat.-(See more on this in the Kararite Anthology / Yale Press; and in Rabbinic commentary on the Karaism.) – HOWEVER: At this point you might want to be asking yourself: Why would a small group of obscure Jews, who DENY that Yeshua is the Messiah, be so interested in establishing Messianic’s halacha, observances, and even in trying to tell you what the New Testament Scriptures should actually mean, according to them. – MORE importantly: WHY WOULD YOU EVEN LET THEM?!]

One will see for different reasons/situations a Rosh Chodesh II sometimes in the current Hebrew/Israeli calendar too; but what one will NOT see are those moving around YHVH’s 1st days of the months like some kind of a 'three-shell-Monte'! Blowing a shofar at the sighting of a sliver-crescent moon on the closing of Rosh Chodesh as a confirmation of the prior New-Moon is one thing; but anyone falsely thinking that they can move YHVH’s ordained and established Moadim for the entire world, based on some small groups traditions they alone are using, is another!

From now on whenever you see the moon, my hope is you may see it a little less obscured by the clouds of confusion, as we contemplate what HaAdonai YHVH Elohim speaks to us in His Word…

Also in the day of your gladness, and in your solemn days, and in the BEGINNING OF YOUR MONTHS, ye shall blow with the trumpets over your burnt offerings, and over the sacrifices of your peace offerings; that they may be to you for a memorial before your Elohim/(God): I am YHVH/(the LORD) your Elohim/(God)." – Numbers 10:10.


~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~

ADDITIONAL LINKS/URLS (ATTACHED TO PHOTOS) RELATED TO THIS SUBJECT FOLLOWING:

ROSH CHODESH (New Moon) - & on Rosh Chodesh I & II -https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=492474647446717&set=a.492226257471556.124944.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F381355_492474647446717_1073216029_n.jpg&size=247%2C364

ECLIPSES: Rosh Chodesh & 15th Day Moadim - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=528386283855553&set=a.492226257471556.124944.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc7%2F315809_528386283855553_593315650_n.jpg&size=634%2C322

Yom-HaTeruah / Day Of Trumpets - Rosh Chodesh (7th month)-Tishrei 1 / Rosh HaShanah - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=492226264138222&set=a.492226257471556.124944.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc7%2F400561_492226264138222_1739728059_n.jpg&size=292%2C404 

This article also contains some related material ~ Some Thoughts On The Issue Of Calendars: http://torahresource.com/EnglishArticles/Calendar_Thots.pdf

This note attached to this photo also contains some related material ~ THE END OF THE AGE/DAYS…Where Are We At? ~ Where Are We Headed?...END-TIME EVENTS, SIGNS, & TRIBULATION-TIMELINE COMPLIED FACTS: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=570588762968638&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-frc1%2F538097_570588762968638_1541048115_n.jpg&size=615%2C381

This note attached to this photo also contains some related material ~ CHART OF COMING 'SIGNS IN THE SKY': https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=285208481506669&set=a.185477824813069.48143.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F287519_285208481506669_405897894_o.jpg&smallsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F321264_285208481506669_405897894_n.jpg&size=1327%2C1021

---

NASA: Phases of the Moon: 2001 to 2025http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/phase/phase2001cst.html

NASA Eclipse Web Sitehttp://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse.html

ECLIPSES 2013:

2013 April 25 — Partial Eclipse of the Moon

2013 May 9-10 — Annular Eclipse of the Sun

2013 May 25 — Penumbral Eclipse of the Moon

2013 Oct. 18-19 — Penumbral Eclipse of the Moon 

2013 Nov. 03 — Total Eclipse of the Sun

ECLIPSES 2014:

2014 April 15 — Total Eclipse of the Moon

2014 April 29 — Annular Eclipse of the Sun

2014 Oct. 8 — Total Eclipse of the Moon

2014 Oct. 23 — Partial Eclipse of the Sun

ECLIPSES 2015:

2015 March 20 — Total Eclipse of the Sun 

2015 April 4 — Total Eclipse of the Moon

2015 Sept. 13 — Partial Eclipse of the Sun

2015 Sept. 28 — Total Eclipse of the Moon

.

 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=567030359991145&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&relevant_count=1 
Messiah In Prophecy Scripture 
The Final-Mem In Isaiah 9:7 ~ Y'shaYahu 9:6


NOTE: While there is a great deal more material and notes that could be shared on this topic, yet this brief article is just a condensed thumb-nail version of this subject to introduce and make you aware of the main facts of this matter...

Of the various Tanakh/(O.T.) passages that Messianic/Christian Believers in Yeshua/(Jesus) note that are speaking prophetically of Messiah: What one will most often hear today from modern Rabbinic-Judaism is that any Messianic application of those particular verses is incorrect (with a few exceptions of some modern Orthodox sources that will speak of the earliest Judaic commentaries on those verses as indeed referring to Messiah).

The one passage that many are probably most familiar with in this regards, is the Isaiah 53 (Is.52:13-53:12) Haftarah-portion (which is skipped over in the progressive reading in Synagogues today) on the ‘Suffering Servant’, which modern Judaism likens to Israel itself; but which the most ancient Judaic commentaries clearly indicate is speaking of Messiah.

Another portion of Scripture that many are familiar with in these regards is Isaiah 9:6-7 / (Y'shaYahu 9:5-6): “For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given: and the government shall be upon His shoulder: and His Name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty EL/(God), The Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of His government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon His Kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of YHVH/(the-LORD) of hosts will perform this.

The above portion presents a problem for modern Rabbinic Judaism, and so today you’ll hear those who say such things as: 
>That already happened prior to the time of Isaiah writing, as it is written in the ‘past tense’’.-(However: There is no ‘past-tense’, in that sense, of Hebrew verbs, as they only have a ‘perfect/imperfect’ form, and in this portion we see a idiomatic-Hebrew use called the "Prophetic Perfect", which is where the prophet speaks of seeing future events where they-{events then in the future} have already happened). 
>Or they’ll say: ‘That portion refers to King Hezikiah’.-(However on that portion it is clearly indicated in Rabbinic Commentary that the Child spoken of there does NOT refer to Hezikiah. However, the commentary does say: "‘...Sovereign of the Universe! it [the earth] hath fulfilled Thy desire [for songs of praise] on behalf of this righteous man.’ But a heavenly Voice cried out, ‘It is my secret, it is my secret.’ To which the prophet rejoined, ‘Woe to me, woe to me: how long [must we wait]?’..." -{Sanhedrin 94a on the Closed-Mem in Is.9:6/(7)}).
-> Yet another way that we see there is a Rabbinic difficulty with this passage of Scripture in modern times, can clearly be seen with how it is treated in the English translation of: “The Holy Scriptures – JPS / Jewish Publication Society – 1917, 1955”, where for Isaiah 9:5b/(vs. 6 in other Bibles) they do not even translate the text into English, but instead print the transliteration of the Hebrew, and then just put the English in a tiny footnote at the bottom of the page ! – Obviously they were concerned at not just how the Messianic/Christians view this passage as prophetically speaking of Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) and His Divinity; but are also showing their concern that anyone reading their English Jewish version of Tanakh might likewise come to the same conclusion on this verse!

But there is even more to this passage as well!…

In Hebrew the letter for “M”/(Mem) is always written as an open/medial (מ) letter in Hebrew words, excepting at the end of words where it is always written as a Closed/Final-Mem called a: Mem-Sofit (ם) letter – EXCEPT for the only exception in all of Scripture being in Isaiah 9:6/(7) where the closed/final Mem is used in the middle of a word !..."Of the INCREASE of His government…”. In this one and only case, we see that the closed-Mem appears in the middle of the word “increase/l:marbeh” (לםרבה). While in and of itself, this highly unusual exception in the midst of this remarkable passage speaks for itself, yet early Judaic commentary adds even more interesting observations…
In Judaism, the Closed-Mem is also spoken of as referring to the closed womb of a woman (One example: Bahir 84-85). This then points us to this Child in verses 9:5-6/(6-7) being of a super-natural birth, and also points us back to this verse of Isaiah 7:14: 
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall call His Name ImmanuEl/(El/God with us).”-(See notes below for more discussion on the Hebrew word for virgin/almah, and the word bethulah.).
…This then also speaks to us of the Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3:15: “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her Seed; It shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise His heel.
…The above verse in Genesis since Biblical times has also been considered in Judaism as referring prophetically to Messiah, and to Him having a super-natural birth –(See notes below for more on this).

This is all quite remarkable, and the more so when considering that the Sopherim were led to use the Closed-Mem in this Isaiah 9 portion.

I pray that all Jewish people would come to know their Messiah Yeshua speedily and soon !

Maranatha: We want Mashiach now…AGAIN !

ישוע המשיח הוא יה את-הדבר אלוהי


FOR MORE INFORMATION: Pastor Mark Biltz of El Shaddai Ministries speaks on this subject in his Feb.2nd 2012 audio/video Shabbat message for the Torah portion Yitro/Jethro, on the Haftarah portion in Isaiah; which you can hear here: http://elshaddaiministries.us/torah5773/20130202.html 

(NOTE: The following are just a few notes related to this subject from the MNV Study Bible, that show early Rabbinic commentary was in line with the Messianic/Christian understandings of these prophetic Messianic passages; though contrary to what you'll hear said from most of Rabbinic-Judaism today. Besides what has been outlined in this brief article and notes, there is much more that could be said that you can research on your own as you feel led)…

MT1:18 RABBINIC: Various Rabbinic quotes of interest [&: Mat.1:23
note]: R. Tanchuma said in the name of R. Samuel: Eve had
respect to that "seed" which is coming from another place. And
who is this? -This is Messiah, the King. Ber.Rab.23,ed.Warsh.
p.45b.
Is it not written that we may preserve a son from our father,
but "Seed from our Father", This is the seed that is coming
from another place. And who is this? -This is the King
Messiah. -Ber. Rabbah (51, ed. Warsh. p.95a, on Gen.19:32).

MT1:23 NOTE: Often the idea is expressed by those not minded to agree
with the LXX Greek reading, that the word ALMAH in Hebrew
should be translated with a more general meaning of: YOUNG-
MAIDEN. However, besides the various arguments in favor of the
word being translated as VIRGIN, as we see in some of the
following quotes, even inside of 'some' Rabbinic lit. the word
is understood as VIRGIN; example: "Behold, a virgin shall
conceive" -there are some who say that this was made a sign,
because a virgin: "fuit non apta generationi" -Kimchi-[Is.
7:14].; ...Kimchi refutes the above by observing that Hezekiah
was nine years old when his father began to reign, and he must
be at this time at least 13 years of age. In like manner
Kimchi; and Ibn Ezra object to it, and besides his mother could
not be called a virgin. *(See: Kimchi on Isa. vii. 15.) -Gill.
R. Huni in the name of R. Joshua said that this man is the King
Messiah of whom it is said Ps. 2:7, This day have I begotten
Thee. -Tal. Bab.; He (God) heals with the same wounds; so you
will find in Israel, they sinned by a virgin, and were punished
in a virgin, so He comforts them by a virgin according to
Jeremiah 31:21,22.-Turn again O virgin of Israel, etc., A woman
shall compass a man. Joshua ben Levi (in Gen.c.41.) apud
Moses Hadarshan.
The idea that Messiah would have no earthly father is
presented to us by Rabbi B'rekhyah: "The Holy One said to
Israel, 'You have spoken before Me saying, We are orphans and
have no father [Lamentation 5:3]: The Redeemer whom I shall
raise up out of your midst will have no father also, as it is
said, Behold, the man whose name is Branch, and He shall branch
up out of his place [Zechariah 6:12]'". -From the Suffering
Servant of Isaiah, According to Jewish Interpreters, S.Driver
and A.Neubauer, Hermon Press, New York, 1877. -{Messiah, A
Rabbinic And Scriptural Viewpoint, Burt Yellin, Published by:
Congregation Roeh Israel 8556 E. Warren Ave. Denver Co. 80231.
(303)-337-6254}.
Also in his comment on Song of Songs 1:3 Rashi explains that
"`ALAMOT" (the plural of "`ALMAH") means "B'TULOT" ("virgins").
Michael Rydelnik, a Hebrew Christian, writes,
"Cyrus Gordon, a greatly respected Jewish scholar who does not
believe in the virgin birth, holds that the cognate languages
demonstrate that in Isaiah 7:14 ALMAH should be translated
'virgin' (see JOURNAL OF BIBLE AND RELIGION, XXI,2 [April
1953], p. 106)." (THE CHOSEN PEOPLE, June 1987, p. 18)*
The above was taken from: Jewish New Testament Commentary,
written by: David H. Stern. Copyright @ 1992, David H. Stern.
All rights reserved (over 1,000 pages) Published by: Jewish New
Testament Publications Post Office Box 1313, Clarksville,
Maryland 21029, USA Telephone (410) 764-6144 Israel office: 78
Manahat, 96901 Jerusalem, Israel First edition, 5,000 copies
Printed in the United States of America ISBN 965-359-008-1
Library of Congress catalog card number 92-097129
[*] -Material not included in, but related to Stern's
Commentary: *RASHI IN MIKRA'OT G'DOLOT ON IS. 7:14:
...Chizkiyahu nomar va"a (veacherim omrim) sheharei ksheat'
mone shanotav timtze shenolad Chizkiyah lifnei malchut aviv 9
shanim veyesh potrin SHEZE HAOT SHEALMAH HAITA VE'EINA REUYAH
LIVALED.
...Hezekiah and others say that when you count his years you'll
see that Hezekiah was born 9 years before his fathers reign and
there are those who think that the sign is that the girl is
VIRGIN AND CAN'T GIVE BIRTH.
*ON ISAIAH 7:14 [pg. 35]"THE YOUNG WOMAN. Hebrew HA'ALMAH means
an adolescent woman, one of marriageable age. [...] The Hebrew
for 'virgin' is BETHULAH, though ALMAH too sometimes bears this
meaning. (ISAIAH Soncino Books Of The Bible; Editor: Rev.Dr.A.
Cohen M.A. Ph.D., D.H.L. by The Rev. Dr. I. W. Slotki, M.A.,
Litt.D. Revised by Rabbi A. J. Rosenberg The Soncino Press
London - New York @ 1983 ISBN 0-900689-28-5)
*(Cyrus Gordon -Journal of Bible and Religion, vol 21, no.2,p.
106): Ever since the publication of the Revised Standard
Version there has been a storm of debate over the translation
of '`almah' in Isaiah 7:14 as "young woman" instead of the King
James "virgin." The commonly held view that "virgin" is
Christian, whereas "young woman" is Jewish is not quite true.
The fact is that the Septuagint, which is the Jewish
translation made in pre-Christian Alexandria, takes '`almah'
to mean "virgin" here. Accordingly, the New Testament follows
Jewish interpretation in Isaiah 7:14.
*See: HaYerushalayim Tanakh, Koren-Publ., (the official version
of the Knesset btw), at Shir Hashirim 1:3 @ the English
portion, -where it translates the plural of almah as VIRGINS.

MT3:16 RABBINIC: The ideal King to whom Isaiah looks forward will be a
scion of the stock of Jesse (The Messiah) on whom will rest the
Spirit of God....[also Is.9:1-6] -Jewish Encyl.vol.8 pg.506,c1.
(Bereshis Rabba 2 [NOTE: Yesha'yahu/Isaiah 11:2]). 

LK1:32 This Aramaic Dead Sea fragment, sigulm 4Q246 from Qumran says:
"[X] shall be great upon the earth. [O King all (people)
shall] make [peace], and all shall serve [Him. He shall
be called the Son of] the [G]reat [God], and by His Name
shall He be hailed (as) the Son of God, and they shall
call Him Son of the Most High."
In both this fragment that is quite like LK.1:32,35, we are
told in both here and Luke that He will be "great"; that He
will be "called" "Son of the Most High" and "Son of God." This
is the first time that the term "Son of God" has been found in
any ancient Israeli text outside of the Bible. Before this
discovery, some scholars had stated that the origin of terms
like these were from Hellenistic usage outside of Israel, and
therefore showed a later usage in Christian development. Now
we know for sure that these terms were indeed a part of
Messianic Judaism's original Jewish heritage.
RABBINIC: For unto us a Son is born, to us a Son is given:
and He shall receive the Torah upon Him to keep It; and His
Name is called from the old, Wonderful, Counselor, ELoha, The
Mighty, Abiding to Eternity, The Messiah, because peace shall
be multiplied on us in His Days. - Targum Jonathan / Is.9:6.

JN14:9 RABBINIC: [On Is.9:6; R. Ibn Ezra:] ...There are some
interpreters who say that 'Wonderful, Everlasting Father' are
Names of God and only 'Prince of Peace' is the Name of the
Child. But according to my view the interpretation is right
(which says): all are the Names of the Child.

NOTE: For a detailed study on “The Divinity Of Messiah, The Tri-Unity Of YHVH Elohim” that you can download (or read online) click here: https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx?cid=535413E3C4FE6FAD&resid=535413E3C4FE6FAD%21301

...Or you can read that whole study on FaceBook, beginning with part 1 (of 7), starting here: https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150116115568627
 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=555719527788895&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&permPage=1
END-TIME-ALERT!:
Those who deny and teach against the Divinity of Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) are under demonic deception!
They speak against both the Tanakh/(O.T. Scripture) & the Brit Chadashah/(N.T. Scripture), and are calling YHVH a liar ! 
All throughout Scripture (both Older and New) Messiah is spoken of as being Divine, as well as It saying that Salvation is through YHVH alone. <–> Since Scripture also says that our Salvation is through Messiah…then if you instead falsely say that He (Messiah) was “ONLY” born as a created man, they you are falsely saying that Scripture says to worship someone else-(who you falsely claim is only a part of the creation)-before/instead-of YHVH the Creator !
Messiah, Who IS come in the flesh: IS The WORD of YHVH Elohim/(God), He created all things (And Elohim/God SAID let there be…) – He is the Voice of YHVH Elohim Who walked with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden in the cool of the evening…And Who now walks in the garden of the hearts of those who know Him ! – Woe! to those who deny this, for you shall stand before the Davar/Memra/Word of YHVH Elohim in Judgment !

Brethren, beware!: If you permit this heresy to be taught (that Messiah is not literally Divine) and allow this to continue in your midst (in the name of some kind of false ‘unity’) then you have joined hands with this demonic-deception, and you will share of the Judgment upon it !

Yeshua HaMashiach Hu YAH ET-HaDavar Elohim
ישוע המשיח הוא יה את-הדבר אלוהים

Yeshua/(Jesus) The-Messiah He (is) YAH/(The LORD) [את]-The-Word (of) Elohim/(God)

והדבר נהיה בשר וישכן בתוכנו 
And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us

(COMMENTS ON A LATER POST #1): 
"Ok then...Since you want to wait the better part of a year to address this issue in a 6 hour video, when a brief outline in a text-file would suffice in the interim for those who've questioned your stance on this major/key issue (as I'd outlined in comments above)...Then going by just by what you've responded to date: It would appear, to one degree or another, your stance is in discord with the Peshat/Simple-plain understanding of the clear passages, aligned with ALL of Scripture-(not being just a doctrine that only agrees with part of Scripture)-that Yeshua Messiah IS YHVH, in the flesh (being both at the same time, as from Yeshua's Birth on: Both man and the pre-existent Word of YAH Elohim - so...LITERALLY YHVH !) - How can I say in accord with "all" of Scripture and the Peshat of the Bible?...(To site just two of dozens of examples): Because while the Greek Brit Chadashah states Messiah is 'Lord' (and without the definite article it can mean YHVH); the Biblical-Aramaic Peshitta leaves no doubt whatsoever of what is being proclaimed:
BIBLICAL ARAMAIC PESHITTA, Phil.2:11: "and that every tongue should confess that Master-YHVH/(MarYAH) is Yeshua Mashiach to the glory of Elohim His Father."
BIBLICAL ARAMAIC PESHITTA, 1Cor.12:3: "I therefore explain to you, that there is no man that speaks by the Spirit of Elohim, who says that Yeshua is accursed: neither can a man say that Master-YHVH/(MarYAH) is Yeshua, except by the Ruach haKodesh."
Yeshua Messiah IS YHVH, in the flesh - both the Creator and the created-(And He did not 'become' Messiah nor the Word of YAH later on in His life, He was born into the world as such). - Any analogy/polemic/apologia that does not also completely adhere to the plain Peshat of Scripture is ALWAYS in error...
For Messiah Yeshua Himself testifies of Himself: "Yeshua/(Jesus) said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Avraham was, I AM." <Greek]-John 8:58-[Aramaic> "Yeshua said to them, Amaine amaine I say to you that before Avraham existed, I was!"
...To conclude otherwise would be to say that the N.T./Brit-Chadashah, even all of Tanakh, is in error and lies."

(COMMENTS ON A LATER POST #2): 
[*** WRITES> 'Y’shua became and is the same Word as the Father, because that is all Y’shua spoke and practiced. We do not worship the man Y’shua is, but the Word that He represents and teaches as the authority." (& etc. along these lines)'
Reply a.) However Scripture doesn't say Yeshua "became" the Word (because of something He did), it says He IS the Word ! Yeshua (in the flesh) did not become the Word, Rather: The Word became flesh as Yeshua - HUGE difference.
Reply b.) It's a dangerous thing to say: "We do not worship the man Y’shua is..." without more qualifying than you've given. For Yeshua is far more than just 'the man', as 'the man' is also: The Tabernacle of Ruach HaDavar YAH Elohim ! - While Scripture shows that Yeshua questioned the motives of the the young man who called Him 'good' Rabbi - who didn't have a revelation from the Spirit of YAH, of who He (Yeshua) fully was, and so this young man was addressing the 'man' Yeshua with an attribute of YAH Elohim; yet: There are various places where people DO 'worship' Yeshua in the N.T., and they are never rebuked for it, and in fact Scripture DOES say that we are to worhip Messiah Yeshua, not as the just man, but because in Spirit and in Truth He Truly IS YAH, the Word of YHVH Elohim; and in that far more than simply "the Word that He represents", for the Spirit/Ruach of Yeshua IS the literal Word of YAH Elohim Himself !... 
"That at the Name of Yeshua every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Yeshua Messiah is Lord, to the glory of Elohim/(God) the Father." - Phil.2:10-11.
"And again, when He bringeth in the Firstbegotten into the world, He saith, And let all the angels of Elohim/(God) worship Him." - Heb.1:6.
...For if He were not actually & literally the very Word of YHVH Elohim Himself, and so an actual part of Elohim (again, for a mundane example: Considering that the words of a man are totally the man, though not the totality of a man) then these verses would be contrary to the 1st Commandment of the Decalogue, and blasphemous. Even as if He were not literally and actually a part of YHVH Himself Elohim, He could not Save, as our Salvation is in YHVH ALONE, as all Scripture agrees.
Scripture declares of the Son...
"But unto the Son He saith, Thy throne, O Elohim/(God), is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of Thy kingdom." - Heb.1:8.
...And while Scripture says to bow in worship to YHVH; when one bowed/fell in worship even before an 'angel' (a fellow-servant of his brethren), they were commanded to not do so and told to 'worship Elohim'; and yet we see these, while Yeshua as a 'man' walked on the earth before His Resurrection...
"And when they were come into the ship, the wind ceased. Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped Him, saying, Of a truth Thou art the Son of God." - Matt.14:32-33.
¶ "Yeshua heard that they had cast him out; and when He had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? He answered and said, Who is He, Lord, that I might believe on Him? And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen Him, and it is He that talketh with thee. And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped Him." - John 9:35-38.
Why is this then a CRITICAL matter that MUST be addressed?...
To in any way mistake the nature of Messiah, in regards to His eternal Divinity, has just as much in error as of those following 'another jesus' who the Catholics say is a seperate-god, as it does of those who propose an Ebionite-view of a 'messiah' who only acquired being the Word, becoming so from something he did...and so a 'messiah' that is: Diminishing and taking the focus off of YHVH as our Salvation ! -
There is a road between these two ditches: It's called the Peshat / simple and plain understanding of all of Scripture on this matter -(since Scripture does not contradict Itself, all plain statements cannot be annulled by any analogy or supposed 'veiled or hard to understand' meanings.)
ישוע המשיח הוא יה את-הדבר אלוהים

NOTE: For a detailed study on this critically important matter, see (on FaceBook notes) this 7 part series (beginning with part 1, then click next for 2 thru 7) here: "The Divinity Of Messiah, The Tri-Unity Of YHVH Elohim (Part 1 of 7)":https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150116115568627

OR VIEW ONLINE the entire study here: https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx?cid=535413E3C4FE6FAD&resid=535413E3C4FE6FAD%21301&app=Word

ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE WHO SAY YOU DON'T AGREE WITH WHAT THE NEW TESTAMENT SAYS IN THE GREEK? - THEN READ THE SAME THING IN THE BIBLICAL-ARAMAIC ! ...

BIBLICAL ARAMAIC PESHITTA, Phil.2:11: "and that every tongue should confess that Master-YHVH/(MarYAH) is Yeshua Mashiach to the glory of Elohim His Father."

BIBLICAL ARAMAIC PESHITTA, 1Cor.12:3: "I therefore explain to you, that there is no man that speaks by the Spirit of Elohim, who says that Yeshua is accursed: neither can a man say that Master-YHVH/(MarYAH) is Yeshua, except by the Ruach haKodesh."
 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=528386283855553&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&relevant_count=1



ECLIPSES: Rosh Chodesh & 15th Day Moadim...



Regardless of which calendar tradition one goes by (Kararite, Rabbinic, Enoch-ian, Qumran, even the Pope, or whatever!); yet the fact remains that while a New-Moon (Psalms/Hebrew: A Dark-New-Moon) actually always occurs scientifically at it's appointed time, it most often cannot be seen -(exceptions are if 14.5+ hours after it's 100% new, & during solar eclipses)- hence the next day being declared by default Rosh-Chodesh II) - HOWEVER...

A solar eclipse ONLY happens on a New-Moon - so you can re-set your 'traditional' calendars by that - since you have now just seen a New-Moon happening (so that night IS Rosh Chodesh regardless of what anyone says) and you've noted it by seeing it in the literal appointed time by observing it. So if your calendars don't note the sunset of that day as the 1st, then they are in error.

By the same token: When YHVH says a Holy Day is on the 15th of the month, and you see a Blood Red Full Lunar Eclipse happening, then you KNOW it is the exact middle of the lunar month, and so that date IS the 15th of the Biblical calendar month - regardless of what your traditions may say otherwise. As a total Lunar Eclipse can only happen in the middle of a lunar month during a 100% full moon. So...Unless your 'traditional' calendars say the 15th (or the 14th in the case of a prior Rosh Chodesh II perhaps) then they are in error.

YHVH said to go by the New Moon (Defined in Psalms 81:3 as the 'dark/covered/hidden new moon'. - Literal Hebrew: "Blow the ram’s horn at the dark new moon today on our feast….") It's interesting to note:
The New-Moon's (Rosh Chodesh) appointed time (it's scientific time when YHVH created it and it actually happens) has been calculated and known since ancient times. The calculations used in the Israeli/Hebrew calendar for the New-Moon use of a mean lunation length, which was also used by Ptolemy and handed down from much earlier, which is still very accurate: ca. 29.530594 days vs. a present value of 29.530589 days. - This difference of only 0.0000005, or five millionths of a day, adds up to about only 4 hours since Babylonian times.

Of course the exact calculations weren't always available in every case during Biblical times, so it was still important for Israel to look for it at the appointed time. -(And I do believe it's important to note the condition of the Barley-Aviv re an Adar I/II 'reset' situation)- But don't let anyone condemn you for going literally by what Scripture says! - It says 'New Moon', and further gives a definition of what that is, but it doesn't specifically spell out A,B,C beyond that. - Much of that is deduced by historical accounts and traditions - and all those contradict each other and have some errors in how they approach this matter. - But each group (and there are many different splinter groups on this subject now, OY!) insists they alone are right. - I'm not saying all the 'traditional' methods are necessarily wrong; but I'll just say that if we KNOW exactly when the scientific New-Moon is, then it seems WRONG to ignore it if our 'traditions' are giving us a different time then when it actually is, and since we KNOW that to be the case. - Likewise: I believe it is WRONG to fault someone who takes a literal approach to what Scripture says in these regards.

SIDE-NOTE: A TETRAD (four blood red moons in a row) on Four Biblical Holy Days is EXTREMELY rare, happening during the last 500+ years only in the Biblical calendar years overlapping: 1492, 1948, & 1967 (and coming up again in 2014/2015). However, along with this what is interesting - is that about 3 & 1/2 years after the middle of the next TETRAD, on July 27th 2018, Tu B'Av on the Hebrew calendar, there is a central lunar eclipse - a "Bull's-eye Blood Moon" directly in line with Jerusalem...Now...Take that into consideration with the following...
1.) 1948 (The blossoming of the Olive Tree / Israel becomes a nation) + 70 years (the age of a man / generation) = 2018.
2.) 1967 (Israel re-takes the Temple Mount in Jerusalem) + 50 years (a Jubilee) = 2017 - and there is another lunar eclipse, again on Tu B'Av, in Aug. 2017.
What does this mean? - Don't know; but I find it very interesting !

Following is more information and links related somewhat to this subject, (in article attached to a photo) here: 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=285208481506669&set=a.185477824813069.48143.100000525582384&type=1

 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL):  https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=527475647279950&set=a.185477824813069.48143.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F487270_527475647279950_989645798_n.jpg&size=495%2C246

Yeshua's Name - BASIC-TEACHING 101:

FOR ALL OF THOSE IN CONTENTION who insist that Messiah's Name in Hebrew/Biblical-Aramaic isn't YESHUA (Yud-Sheen-Vahv-Ahyin), and that we are in error for saying this, and that you and you alone know the repressed truth...you are wrong! In ALL the carvings, documents/letters, and the very many manuscripts (except for only a couple places which use a longer form of Y'hoshua/Joshua in a Midrashic type of Targum usage for Messiah) from the 1st Cent. AD/ce and on: We find that they are always written in Hebrew and Biblical-Aramaic as: YESHUA (Yud-Sheen-Vahv-Ayin). - (Click on this YouTube video link for just one example of this from ancient Israel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P6Y23FT-Gd4 )

[NOTE: Photo & Video of recent excavation of ancient Synagogue in Susya Israel that was used in the 3rd and into the 4th Century AD/ce, showing the Name of Messiah YESHUA in mosaic in Hebrew. Messianic Jewish Believers in Messiah Yeshua/(Jesus) continued on in communities in ancient Israel past 70 AD/ce & 135 AD/ce, and on into the 4th Century AD/ce., as the evidence shows.]



NOTE: For more information on the Name "Yeshua" & 'Jesus', see article/notes/links attached to a photo here: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=420117271349122&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&src=https%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ash4%2F399050_420117271349122_975953416_n.jpg&size=899%2C659
 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL): https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=518558148171700&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&theater

FIREWALL...

END-TIME DEFENSE/APOLOGIA 101: 

Of the foremost importance for a "firewall" to keep one from the many false-teachings (both of men and demons) that are increasing rapidly in these End-Times, is this simple check/test (that even a 4 year old who Believes knows is true); which is...

THE PLAIN/SIMPLE-(PESHAT/PESHETTA) MEANING OF SCRIPTURE IS ALWAYS TRUE!

Any: Derash/midrash, remez, sod, commentary, analogy, study, creed, dogma, doctrine, polemic, ANYTHING !...that is against, contrary to, or diminishes, the plain and simple expressed meaning IN WHOLE OR IN PART Of ANY PORTION of Scripture is worthless (at best), or is deadly ! - THROW IT OUT ! - (Yet: Some of these things "might" hold some merit, but only if they agree totally with, and do not in any way contradict, the entire Word of Elohim/God YHVH).

YHVH does NOT lie! What He plainly says in His Word is True in and of Itself, and it is given to us simple enough for even a small child to understand and believe ! - It is the 'wisdom/understanding' of carnal man that messes it up...and often the more "verbose" and "scholarly" sounding something is...the WORSE it is ! 

Any sense, that invalidates the plain-sense of Scripture, is nonsense !

FOOTNOTE: 

If you've read something in the Brit-Chadashah (New Testament / New Covenant) Scriptures (whether you are looking at the Greek, Hebrew/Aramaic, or even in the English) that you "think" that portion of Scripture is contrary to the rest of the Bible and is not Elohim/God's Word: Then it is YOU OR SOMETHING ELSE that is wrong; but never YHVH's Word-[neither in the Older nor in the New]. - As Scripture does NOT contradict Itself !

...The problem lies in: Trying to apply incorrect commentaries of man to the passage, bad translations from man of the Original Word that YAH gave to mankind, disregarding the passage in context &/or in light of the balance of Scripture, or disregarding the Biblical era culture & context, or applying incorrect usages of the Greek Hebrew/Aramaic or even the English (often through ignorance), lacking Discernment from Above while trying to make something fit into your own personal criteria or bias, approaching the Word when reading from doubt rather than from Faith, holding historical bias/inaccuracies that have become accepted as fact but are in fact false, and various other things that attempt to cloud ones sight; HOWEVER!...

YHVH-Elohim's/(The LORD God's) Word NEVER contradicts Itself nor is It in error, from Beresheet/Genesis through Revelation! If it appears to be so, the error stems from elsewhere than the Bible. - Don't be ignorant: Be a Berean !

2Ti 2:15 "Study to shew thyself approved unto Elohim/God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, RIGHTLY DIVIDING the Word of Truth."

Ro 3:4 "Elohim/God forbid: yea, let Elohim/God be True, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged."

-&-

(NOTE: For further information see - There is a gap, a space the size of eternity, between knowing all about God, and knowing Him!: https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150100643623627 )

(NOTE: For further information see - The Literal & Inspired Written Word of YHVH Elohim: https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=307205623626 )

AND I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THE FOLLOWING VIDEO...NOTE: The following is a faith re-enforcing exhortation video on the Plenary Inspiration of The Bible, The Word of YHVH-Elohim/(LORD God) - {YES: All of The-Bible/Scripture is YAH's Word: From Beresheet through Revelation - [Mashiach Yeshua Hu YAH Elohim ET-(Aleph-Tahv / Alpha Omega) HaDavar/(The Word)]} - CLICK HERE TO SEE THIS VIDEO BY GENE BINDER OF CORNERSTONE - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDmw-NN3jTk&feature=plcp
 
Apologia & Doctrinal:
(FaceBook URL): 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=465659100128272&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384& 

THE ABOVE PHOTO should be a required warning sticker for most of the Christian & Messianic "teachers" today in Laodicea-Babylon...!

END-TIME-DISCERNMENT 101:
One of several main reasons we're seeing an increase in false dogma/doctrines being taught today (even from those who themselves might not be wolves in sheeps' clothing) is the inability of many teachers to be able to say the following two simple phrases:

"I DON'T KNOW" -&/or- "I WAS WRONG"...(Which lack on their part is almost always do to a form of pride).




NOTE:

Ok folks, let's get real here for a second ! Almost 99.9% of all Messianic/Hebraic Believers became so first as Christians, and because they had a relationship with Yeshua Messiah when they knew Him only as Jesus Christ, and because they were able to hear the Ruach Kodesh (Holy Spirit) speak to them: They were then able to hear Yeshua lovingly speak to them what was His real Hebrew Name (Yeshua), and to hear Him lovingly show them the Biblical-Hebraic roots of their faith that had been cut off by the Catholic church in the 4th century A.D.. - So in short ALMOST ALL Messianic/Hebraic Believers were first SAVED as Christians and then heard from YHVH what the Truth was and were thus able to hear from Him also what the error was. - The circumspect approach to those in error, (to those who are where we ourselves were at O so short a time ago!) is to be likewise loving in our speaking to them the Truth, and in showing them the error. - There are 'Christian' Groups that do keep the Shabbat, and others that keep the Feasts and have come to various degrees of understanding on the Biblical-Hebraic roots of our Faith. - To know what you Believe and so have an anchor of who you are, is VASTLY different than trying to define who you are by saying what you hate and are not ! - While Christianity has obviously digressed into error over the centuries from Scripture; yet: Many Messianic/Hebraic groups are rapidly playing catch-up with them ! - In the last 5 to 7 years or so: Many Messianic/Hebraic "teachers"/groups themselves have now morphed into various degrees of cultic beliefs....To the point where I can understand why many sincere Christians who simply want to know the Truth, would instead stay a mile away from some of these "Messianic/Hebraic" groups/"teachers" ! - Shame SHAME on those who'd try and proclaim, to those teachable & innocent/ignorant, the Good-News mingled with unloving-bitterness & worldly-religious pride !

...And the following post/link I'm giving once again as it addresses another subject that many Messianic/Hebraic "teachers"/Believers have fallen for that is absolutely from fake pseudo-'scholarship' and deception: 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=420117271349122&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&3 


 
Apologia & Doctrinal:


(FaceBook URL):
https://www.facebook.com/photo.phpfbid=419396001421249&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&

LAWlessness -&- LEGALism:
The Two Ditches...

     LAWlessness & Legalism are becoming deeper and more distinct - and many are falling into one or the other ! - If satan can't get you away from one he'll try and push you far into the other (trying to get you to play Grace and Law against each other). We need to be grounded IN THE WORD OF YAH !
     I've seen 'solid' (so I thought) Christians falling into one dtch, and 'solid' (so I thought) Messianics falling into the other ! - When man refuses to Worship The Father in Spirit and Truth, as Messiah Yeshua/Jesus tells us to do, then they will heed the words of man with their own understanding. - As times wax worse, the words of many are just this...the doctrines of men and demons. - And without having a close relationship in the spirit with Messiah in the Inner Man in the Holy Spirit of YAH, they can (and often do) follow false religious spirits from the outside and get tangled up with them.
     There was an old commentary from about 100 years ago that expressed it quite well: Substituting Law for Grace, or Grace for Law is as sowing diverse seed in a row (which is a Torah violation).
     - The Law (YAH's revealed Will) Sanctifies (sets us apart) from the world - BECAUSE we are Justified by Faith (as was believing Avram). - Trying to substitute one for the other, or trying to cast out either one while clinging to the other, is deception and sin.
     ...And it is the same in the Brit HaChadashah and Tanakh: The just shall live by FAITH.

Do we then make void the Law through Faith? God FORBID: yea, we ESTABLISH the Law. - Ro.3:31.

For the time will come when they will not endure Sound Doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; - 2Ti.4:3. 


Click Here For A Related Study: END-TIME-ALERT!...
Just TORAH-OBSERVANT? -OR- ALL-SCRIPTURE OBSERVANT? -(&)- Those of you who've spoken against the New-Testament/Brit-Chadashah, you are in error !)... https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=352517644775752&set=a.101379583222894.3164.100000525582384&&relevant_count=1


 

Apologia & Doctrinal:
http://tshuvah.weebly.com/03122012bewaregreekhebrewaramaicenglish.html 

BEWARE!: GREEK? HEBREW? ARAMAIC? ENGLISH?...

Those who malign the Greek New Testament don’t have a clue what they’re talking about!

BACKGROUND-FACTS:

     During the 1st century AD (aside from Israel & the Syriac region) most Jews, in fact most of the population of the Jews in the world, didn’t speak Hebrew/Aramaic; most all of them did however speak Greek. While the early Rabbinic writings don’t speak well of the Greek language, yet over the centuries since the time of the Grecian Empire and it’s offshoots, Greek had become a universal trade language (mush as English is so universal in use today; & perhaps even more so with Greek back then), and it was well known in Israel, and especially in the North (HaGalil) region. In fact some of the later Rabbinic writings themselves employ Greek. The Disciples/Apostles would have been familiar with Greek, especially those from Galilee, and even some perhaps from their prior occupations were able to write in Greek (especially Luke, and most probably even Matthew the Tax-Collector).

     After so many years since Yeshua/Jesus Messiah’s Resurrection, the Disciples/Apostles found themselves in the situation where myriads of Greek speaking Jews and Gentiles in the Diaspora were coming to faith in Yeshua in Congregations in many countries. - Since it was YHVH’s Will, and Yeshua’s Command, to fulfill the ‘Great Commission’ of spreading the Good-News/Gospel throughout the world – to the Jew first and also to the Greek/(Gentile). - It was soon obvious that short of the impossible task of teaching the entire world how to speak Hebrew/Aramaic: Communications and spreading the Gospel would have to be accomplished by choosing the one language which had the most universal understanding amongst the majority of the then known world…Greek. – And which would remain the one language that would reach more people than any other for centuries to come.

     It was fortunate for them (and for us) that the language that was spoken in the world at large then was Greek, and not some other; since: Greek is/was one of the most precise and scientific languages there is (especially compared to English, which is a sloppy, imprecise composite-language). If one takes the time to actually compare the Greek texts to the few Hebrew portions we have and the Biblical-Aramaic texts of the N.T., if they’d admit it, it will be noted that the literal Greek in certain cases actually has even more of a Biblical-Judaic meaning, and this is in part because it is such a precise language. It is also interesting and important to note that the Greek dialect used in the Majority/(Eastern) Greek manuscripts is Koinine-Greek (not Classical Greek), which was a specific dialect that was used in 1st Century AD Israel.

     BEWARE then those who’d malign the Greek New Testament!...Them telling you what’s wrong, and how you need their ‘expert superior’ guidance to understand what YHVH is trying to tell you -(Yet amusingly most of them doing so in English…as most of them are not at all proficient in Greek, nor even in Hebrew/Biblical-Aramaic)- many of them simply being motivated by a buck &/or a need to make a name for themselves.

     ADVICE: While the above is only a thumbnail sketch of what could be said on this matter; yet considering the above, my advice to you when confronted with this is: RUN FOREST RUN !  :-)


[PLEASE NOTE: However, I'm not saying that the Biblical-Aramaic, and the small portions of Hebrew for the N.T. that we have, don't have any value. Please read what I wrote carefully in context. This post was dealing with those who come against the Greek New Testament Scripture.]

( ALSO NOTE: For a related study, see the following which you can read on FaceBook here: https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=307205623626  -OR- Download/read from here: https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=535413E3C4FE6FAD&id=535413E3C4FE6FAD!107 - The file is called: "The Literal Inspired Word Of YHVH Elohim" - which is the last file in that list when you go to it. )

 
Apologia & Doctrinal:

http://tshuvah.weebly.com/02272012hatethesinlovethesinner.html

THE STATEMENT "HATE THE SIN LOVE THE SINNER" is wrong as it stands unqualified (because there is only a thin line in the statement between Biblical truth and error):
     This post isn't about not showing love as Believers for the lost; rather it is about a misplaced or perverse type of love being substituted for "Agape Love"...
     While it is true that by nature we are all sinners; yet in a very important sense we are NOT called to "love" those who practice gross iniquity and evil. haSatan loves those who practice evil. Tolerance of evil is in itself evil, by the sin of omission. A tolerant soft-loving attitude displayed to those who continue to commit the most vile acts, does not do those individuals who practice wickedness any good...rather it harms them, quenches conviction, and enables and encourages them to continue to practice lawlessness. -
     The problem is those who want to be 'loving' but fail to abide in the distinction between Agape -vs- phileo 'love' by incorrectly substituting in application one for the other.
     We're called as Believers to be Sanctified apart from the world; but not as some kind of a 'world-conformed tolerant-hippie' ! :-)
 
NOTE: Here is my reply to someone who commented on this post I had put on my FaceBook profile page:
 ...Know us by our love for "one another"/Believers - that is Agape-&-phileo, not phileo-&-eros. Seeing our love for one another is a conviction when they don't have it, and it is not shown to them who remain in wickedness, and so it moves then to repentance and draws them to YAH's Love. - Showing a misplaced 'love', one convincing themselves they are walking in Apage-Love by doing so, has the opposite effect....taking away their opportunity for conviction and repentance. - Saying I don't really like what Hitler did, but I love him - is contrary to New Testament teaching. - As Agope Love is not phileo love, Love From Above is not worldly love. - That doesn't mean don't have compassion, concern for the lost...AGAPE LOVE. - But the misplaced love that exhibits extremes says things like: "I love terrorists, murderers, and rapists; I just don't really care for what they do" <- is perverse!...almost demonic sounding if taken to the extreme. - Yeshua Messiah loves the sinner, yet He drove the money-changers out of of the Temple with a whip. YHVH loves His creation, yet calls those His enemies who are apart from Him...yet He still loves...as Agape Love is circumspect; but worldly-love is myopic. We are called to walk in Agape Love at all times...but we are commanded to not walk in phileo (friendship) with the world-which Scripture says is enmity with God. We need to pray for discernment to know the difference.


NOTE: And I replied again to another’s comment:
…You see, there's one deadly difference between the Gospel that was still proclaimed in the 60's and early 70's; and the gospel that we hear from mega-church pulpits today....One deadly difference between the sloppy-agape love that's being preached today, and True Agape Love that Scripture talks about. -

     Even the song "just as I am without one plea" can be misleading in the way some preachers spin it today; as the song should be saying: 'Just as I've been with one major heart's plea...SAVE ME!'…As Yeshua/Jesus doesn't love those who are lost and in sin "just as they are", rather in the sense that: He loves them starting from where they are and inspite of where they've been! At first glance that sounds the same, but it isn't even close! The woman caught in adultery wasn't told to 'go and feel good about yourself just as you are' - she instead was told to "go and sin no more".  Messiah met people where they were at, but then immediately took them in His Love and lifted them from where they'd been. - He didn't say feel good about yourself as you are and come to Me. – Rather the message was: Confess your sins, repent/turn unto YAH from your wicked ways… <- And that was still a given in the 60's and early 70's; but it is not for the most part what we're hearing today.

     Now while: Condemnation not born of Agape Love is not True love, as that’s religious legalism apart from YAH’s compassion for the lost; yet love that holds no room for rebuke, conviction, confession and repentance is not Agape love either!...rather that is a worldly counterfeit love…a buddhist-style, hippie-type, feel good about yourself, peace love dove type of love maybe; but it is not Agape 

     What's your story?...during the 60’s I’m pretty sure I was a worse sinner than most. But back then I meet Christians who were genuinely concerned and approached me as I was, in True Agape praying that I’d turn from my wicked ways, and be Born From Above made a new creation; but they didn’t accept me unSaved into their midst as an equal, telling me to just feel good about myself and tolerating an unrepentant lifestyle…they weren’t the type of modern Christians who’d welcome you ‘just as you are’ into their circle to feel better and good about yourself; rather: They were the type of Christians who’d have you sit in the middle of their prayer circle and pray for you to repent, confess your sins, and accept Jesus/Yeshua Messiah into your life !

     I love my kids, but there are some things I will not ‘tolerate’ them doing in my midst…that is true love and concern for them. – But I’m sure we’ve all seen some parents who want to appear loving, and who for the sake of that fake-love will let their kids continue in all kinds of wickedness and not even speak to them about it, so not wanting to come off as unloving…that is NOT Agape love!

     Fake-agape love –vs- True Agape-Love: On the surface they look similar – but they aren’t - one will only "love" you while it silently watches you march into hell !


And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. - Jude 1:22-23.


 

        Teachings / Blog

    Categories

    All
    Apologia & Doctrinal
    Biblcal Holy Days & Observances
    Hebraic Position Papers
    My Testimony
    Prophetic End Time Events
    Questions & Comments
    Thought For Today

    Archives:

    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    Author:

    Tshuvah, WarReport, Israelshomer, Wm Ben-Carl


    /

    [DISCLAIMER: Commentary, comments, and articles on this WebSite site (and all other associated sites, pages, groups, websites, etc. in general) may contain some unverified Intel. or content, and likewise some of these articles comments and commentary may not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners &/or administrators of this site. - Yet they are given nevertheless for informational purposes for your careful consideration with the assumption that you have enough discernment to decide for yourself what is true and what is not; and so they are given at least to show the views of what various people are saying today - regardless of whether their premise, facts, and conclusions, are valid or not.

    The articles/views given in this site do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of the owners and/or administrators here nor anyone associated with it, and are given for informational purposes.

    FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may (or may not) contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Should this happen to be the case: We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site(s) is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site(s) for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s).]

    (PRIVACY NOTICE {Also extended to this site and all associations, sites, and parties as mentioned/noted above}:

    Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited... to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this site or any of its associations (defined above), you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo's or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.

    Further I/(we) affirm the following:

    Amendment IV, United States Constitution:

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.)

    \

    יְבָרֶכְךָ יְהוָה, וְיִשְׁמְרֶךָ
     
    יָאֵר יְהוָה פָּנָיו
    אֵלֶיךָ, וִיחֻנֶּךָּ


    יִשָּׂא יְהוָה פָּנָיו אֵלֶיךָ, וְיָשֵׂם לְךָ שָׁלוֹם

                ~
    ישוע המשיח הוא יה
    את-הדבר
     
    אלוהים
      
     

    Mezuzah:
    And Yeshua answered him, The first of all the commandments is, ¶ Hear, O Israel: YHVH our God YHVH is One: And thou shalt love YHVH thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. - And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. (Deut. 6:4-5 & Mark 12:29-31)